<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christology and Sociality in Bonhoeffer (Part 2/2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krisispraxis.com/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krisispraxis.com/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/</link>
	<description>To Understand Truth and to Attain the True</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:53:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sivin</title>
		<link>http://www.krisispraxis.com/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/comment-page-1/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>Sivin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisispraxis.ath.cx/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/#comment-4327</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a more pastoral perspective, </p>
<p>&#8220;Only such a church-centred Christology could convince the unbeliever today that the slogan â€śhostile to the church but friendly to Jesusâ€? is both mistaken and unnecessary.&#8221; may be true as Christ and the Church shoudn&#8217;t be divided by one&#8217;s whims and fancy or mere discomfort. </p>
<p>But practically,  our inability as a church to seriously deal with &#8220;why people are hostile to the church?&#8221; with self-critical robust ecclesiology as well as ministry praxis seems me creating serious barriers towards genuine seekers and fellow pilgrims on this side of heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sivin</title>
		<link>http://www.krisispraxis.com/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/comment-page-1/#comment-4326</link>
		<dc:creator>Sivin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krisispraxis.ath.cx/archives/2007/02/christology-and-sociality-in-bonhoeffer-part-22/#comment-4326</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my questions:
1. Is NOT &quot;explaining how they both indwell Christ as a hypostatic union or how both these aspects are communicated in Christâ€™s revealed presence.&quot; a weakness or a difference in theological approach?

2.  &quot;Similarly, Clifford J. Green (p. 198) notes the unresolved tension between an overpowering, authoritarian Christ in The Cost of Discipleship and the weak, humiliated Christ of Letters from Prison.&quot;Is there a place for unresolved tension in theology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my questions:<br />
1. Is NOT &#8220;explaining how they both indwell Christ as a hypostatic union or how both these aspects are communicated in Christâ€™s revealed presence.&#8221; a weakness or a difference in theological approach?</p>
<p>2.  &#8220;Similarly, Clifford J. Green (p. 198) notes the unresolved tension between an overpowering, authoritarian Christ in The Cost of Discipleship and the weak, humiliated Christ of Letters from Prison.&#8221;Is there a place for unresolved tension in theology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
